Research‎ > ‎

Research Seminars

This workshop takes place at least once a month on Wednesdays (room N305, time and date as advertised).

Professors from other departments and institutions, as well as PhD students, are more than welcome to attend the workshop so as to get the most recent information on the research areas developed in our department and to foster possible collaborations on common projects.
contact: Marie Kratz (kratz@essec.edu) and Guillaume Chevillon (chevillon@essec.edu) if you want to be included in the mailling list
 
2011 / 2012 seminars
 

 

Xavier BRY (Université de Montpellier 2)

Wednesday, January, 18th, 2011

 

 

Esko PENTTINEN (Aalto University, Helsinki)

Wednesday, December, 14th, 2011

 

Exploring the Criteria for Selecting a Service Provider in Open Standard Interorganizational linkages

 

In this paper, we examine the decision-making problem of selecting a service provider in the setting of open standard interorganizational linkages (IOL). Based on a literature review on vendor selection criteria, expert interviews, and pilot case studies in six organizations, we develop a research instrument consisting of nine criteria: Reach, Economic Viability, Flexibility in Technology Consolidation, Project Management Ability, Customer References, Long Term Total Price, Relationship, Service Development, and End-user Usability. We operationalize these criteria to the case of electronic invoicing and draw on a survey consisting of 308 responses from companies. Using discrete choice analysis, we find that End-user Usability and Reach are the two most important criteria for companies when choosing a service provider in the setting of open standard electronic invoices. Our results highlight the importance of interoperability and network effects (criterion Reach) in open standard IOL. Furthermore, when moving from EDI (Electronic Data Interchange)-based IOL to open standard IOL, the user base of companies is larger than in the case of point to point EDI connections (also SMEs). This accentuates the importance of ease of use (criterion End-user Usability).

 
 

Robert TAYLOR (Nottingham University)

Wednesday, November, 16th, 2011

 

 

Jean-Philippe BRUNETON (Namur University, Belgium)

Thursday, October, 20th, 2011 at 12:30 pm, at La Defense EEE, room 101

 

Diversification Benefit in Gaussian Aggregation Trees

 

Insurance risks are often aggregated together with the help of copulas: risks whose individual marginals are known are tied together via some function (the copula). In mathematical language, their joint distribution is defined via the copula. We focus our study on the aggregation of risks within so-called hierarchical trees: A tree of aggregation refers to applying several times such a process, linking some marginals together, then linking the resulting marginals together, and so on and so forth, until the total portfolio is modelized.  We study in particular the "Gaussian Tree" where both marginals and copulas are Gaussian. This enables exact anlytical results for the r.v. of the total portfolio, and therefore the exact computation of the diversification benefit (the release in solvency capital due to diversification of risks, but taking into account their interdependencies). Such a toy model enables us to study the impact of the width and depth of the tree on the diversification benefit. We show that "tight trees" diversify better than "fat trees". We also show some numerical results that support this conclusion also outside the Gaussian world: Lognormal Trees aggregated via Gaussian or Clayton copula show the same overall behavior.

 

 

2010 / 2011 seminars
 

Suzanne EMMER (UBS, Zürich)

Thursday, May, 5th, 2011 at 12:30 pm, at La Defense EEE, room 201

Credit Stress Loss

 

After a short overview of currently used credit risk measures and the stress testing landscape we give an introduction to different stress testing methodologies which are applied to the wealth management and business banking portfolio.

 

Shubho DAS (Indian Institute of Management Bangalore)

Wednesday, April, 20th, 2011 at 2 pm, Nautile # N305 -  Cergy Campus

On few Measurement Problems in Sports

 

Application of statistical and OR methods in the domain of sports has been on steady rise, leading to academic conferences and journals dwelling exclusively on this domain.  In this talk, we would discuss approaches to solving couple of such problems. The up-to-date position of competing teams based on points obtained by them in the middle of any round-robin (stage of) tournament may inadequately reflect their actual relative position, because of the strength of the opposition faced till that stage. To help the followers of the game, as well as to possibly help the teams to strategize, a simple probably matrix based approach followed up by computation of the expected points may easily bring clarity to the situation. While an unstructured or unconstrained way of updating these probabilities, reflecting individual perspective, at successive stages of the tournament may be ok, it being ad-hoc, also suffers from arbitrariness and may lack consistency. In that context, we explore how a model based Bayesian adaptation can work effectively. In cricket, batting average has always been used as primary measure of performance of a batsman. But traditional batting average exhibits serious limitation in reflecting true performance of a batsman in light of notout innings. Treating notouts as censored data, adaptation of Kaplan-Meir estimator provides a more reasonable solution, but it still suffers both from conceptual as well as operational problems at certain situations. A generalized class of geometric distribution (GGD) is proposed in this work to model the runs scored by individual batsmen, with the generalization coming in the form of hazard of getting out changing from one score to another.  We consider the change points as the known or specified parameters and derive the general expressions for the restricted maximum likelihood estimators of the hazard rates under the generalized structure considered. Given the domain context, we propose and test ten different variations of the GGD model and carry out the test across the nested models using the asymptotic distribution of the likelihood ratio statistic. We propose two alternative approaches for improved estimation of batting average on the basis of the above modeling.

  

Véronique HEIWY (Université Paris Descartes / LIPADE)

Wednesday, March, 16th, 2011 at 2:15 pm, Nautile # N305 -  Cergy Campus

Will the Next Generation of Campus be Intelligent?

 

Ambient Intelligence is a multi-disciplinary research topic combining ubiquitous computing, distributed architecture and aiming at providing context-aware support to people in various domain such as domotic, health-care or eduction.

After a brief presentation of “Ambient Intelligence” (Aml) and its close relation with Multi-Agent systems (MAS), this presentation will show how Aml services could help the actors of the Paris Descartes Technology Institute (i.e. students, professors and staff) by describing Aml scenarios and giving a possible implementation of these scenarios. Aml provides new solutions but raises also new problems such as security, privacy that should be taken into account.

 

Doug ANDREWS (University of Southampton, UK)

Wednesday, February, 3rd, 2011 at 1 pm, at La Defense EEE, room 104

Risk Management Considerations for the Canada Pension Plan: A Case Study

 

What are the risks that the Canada Pension Plan faces and how are they managed? This presentation begins with a review of the governance structure, the actuarial valuation method and the automatic balancing mechanism. It then examines particular assumptions, such as fertility, mortality, migration, productivity and investment. It explains the risks, discusses the methods used to derive the assumptions, and outlines some of the sensitivity tests used to quantify the risk.

 
Olivier WINTENBERGER (Université Paris Dauphine, Paris)
Wednesday, Januray, 19th, 2011 at at 11:15 am, Nautile # N305 -  Cergy Campus

Limit laws for sums of weakly dependent data with infinite variances

(ISDS and Working Group on Risk seminar)  

Many econometrical models take into account two stylized facts: the dependence structure of the time series (absence of correlations, dependence of the squares) and the high volatility (tails as power laws).  If the dependence is not too strong, the asymptotic behavior of the sum is no longer distributed as a normal law but as another type of stable law. Thus, the dependence and the power law marginals drive the limit law in a very intricated way. In a work done with K. Bartkiewicz, A. Jakubowski and T. Mikosch, we suceeded to give a non standard central limit theorem where we clearly determined in the limiting stable law what is due to the dependence and what is due to the marginal law. We apply our result to the sum of the stationary solution of the GARCH(1,1) model.
 
Eric SOUTIF (CNAM, Paris)
Wednesday, December, 15th, 2010 at at 11:15 am, Nautile # N305 -  Cergy Campus

A framework to solve quadratic optimization problems with integer decision  variables - An application to portfolio management

 

This presentation is devoted to the solution of quadratic optimization problems with integer decision variables. A financial application of these optimization problems is portfolio management which attempts to maximize portfolio expected return and minimize portfolio risk, by carefully choosing the various assets that constitute the portfolio. Our study concerns convex integer quadratic problems where the objective function is non separable. The aims of this work are twofold. Firstly, we propose a new linearization scheme for non separable integer quadratic problems. Secondly we show how to use this linearization to solve the initial problem and present numerical results.

 
Philippe SOULIER (Université Paris Nanterre)
Thursday, November, 25th, 2010 at 12:30 pm, in La Defense EEE Campus, # 202 

Prediction for time series after catastrophic events

(ISDS and Working Group on Risk seminar) 

We consider the problem of prediction in a time series when the conditioning event is extreme. The quantities of interest are the limiting conditional distribution of future events given that the past was extreme, and the normalizing functions needed to obtain non degenerate these limit laws. I will consider two classes of processes: GARCH-type and stochastic volatility processes. The main difference is the presence or absence of clustering of extremes.

 
Anurag BANERJEE (Durham University, UK)
Wednesday, October, 13th, 2010 at 11:15 am, Nautile # N305 -  Cergy Campus
  

Informed Momentum Trading versus Uninformed “Naïve” Investors Strategies

 

We construct a zero-net-worth uninformed "naive investor" who uses a random portfolio allocation strategy. We then compare the returns of the momentum strategist to the return distribution of naive investors. For this purpose we reward momentum profits relative to the return quintiles of the naive investors with scores that are symmetric around the median. The score function thus constructed is invariant and robust to risk factor models. We find that the average scores of the momentum strategies are close to zero (the score of the median) and statistically insignificant over the sample period between 1926 and 2005, various sub-sample periods including the periods examined in Jegadeesh and Titman (1993 and 2001). The findings are robust with respect to sampling or period-specific effects in our simulations where we randomly select 10 years for 100 times.

 
Claes FORNELL (University of Michigan, USA)
Thursday, September 23rd, 2010 at 11 am -  Cergy Campus - seminar oganized jointly with the Department of Marketing
 

The (Enormous) Cumulative Economic Relevance of Customer Satisfaction - A PLS Based Approach

Claes Fornell presents research and results, from an actual stock portfolio, which seem contradictory to conventional wisdom.  First, it is possible to consistently outperform the stock market.  Second, this can be done without taking on more risk.  While inconsistent with financial theory, the results are consistent with SCIENCE in the more general sense: Knowledge can be used – in just about any context - in order do better (than competition) and it can be used to reduce risk.

In order to gauge the probable future benefit of any corporate economic asset – such as customer satisfaction – it is necessary to examine both contemporaneous and intertemporal effects.  The latter effects have been overlooked in previous studies, but it turns out that they are quite sizable and have about the same size as the contemporaneous ones.  They are obtained from the power of customer satisfaction portfolio returns to predict future excess market returns. If investors would pay more attention to the primary sources of future cash flows – and most of them come from repeat consumer spending - aggregate consumer utility would increase and equity markets would benefit from greater efficiency.


 

2009/2010 seminars

 
Latest Seminar:

Conference on Financial Regulation
Friday, April 9, 2010 at 9 am -
BFA -SFdS & Risk Working Group - ESSEC
 
Guy FITZGERALD (Brunel University, UK)
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 at 12 am -  Cergy Campus, Nautile room N305
The Case for Cases in Information Systems Inquiry
This presentation will examine and discuss the case study interpretive approach to research in information systems, using illustrations from three case study inquiries undertaken by the author. The case studies are; The Halifax Share Dealing Service, the London Ambulance Computer Aided Dispatch System, and the Rolls Royce Aeromanager Portal. These cases, it is argued, provide interesting and relevant contributions to the information systems academic domain and that the case study approach should be regarded as a legitimate method of enquiry and be wiewed as part of the pluralism of methods appropriate for information systems research. The author has undertaken research using various approaches but is concerned at the seeming decline of the case study approach in the literature and as an acceptable method for some of the higher rated journals. The presentation will discuss issues of cases and theory development, cases and grounded approaches, and cases and generalisation, as well as some of the limitations of cases.
 
Marie KRATZ (ESSEC Business School, Paris)
Thursday, February 18, 2010 at 12:30 am -  La Défense campus (CNIT floor 1 (parvis/plaza),  entrance to the left: bureaux/offices No 2) room 138
On alarm systems. Applications for Insurance companies and for Health surveillance Institute
(ISDS and Working Group on Risk seminar) 
The aim of the study is to develop an appropriate alarm system for the early detection of time clusters applied to public health surveillance data or to prevent or reduce the chance of ruin of an insurance company. Indeed, one approach to risk management for an insurance company is to develop an effective alarm system before the possible ruin and to recommend an augmentation of capital of suitable magnitude at the alarm times to prevent or reduce the chance of ruin. To draw a fair measure of effectiveness of alarm system(s), comparison is made with existing warning systems for public health surveillance, and in the case of insurance companies, between a process equipped with alarm system, with capital being added at the sound of every alarm, and the corresponding process without any alarm system but an equivalently higher initial capital.
 
Sir David F. HENDRY (Nuffield College & Economics Department, Oxford)
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 6:00 pm - La Défense campus (CNIT floor 1 (parvis/plaza),  entrance to the left: bureaux/offices No 2) room 210
Empirical Model Discovery   link to presentation documents
(ISDS and Working Group on Risk seminar) 
The talk summarizes a great deal of recent research, and explains how it facilitates the discovery of empirical models, greatly reducing the risks from model mis-specification and data contamination. Model evaluation concerns discovering what is wrong; robust statistics as discovering which sub-sample is reliable; non-parametric methods as discovering the functional form; and model selection as discovering which model best matches the given criteria. However, the high dimensionality, non-linearity, inertia, endogeneity, evolution, and abrupt change characteristic of economic data, which interact to make empirical modelling difficult and pose substantive risks of ending with an incorrect representation, make it essential to tackle all of these jointly. Automatic methods enable formulation, selection, estimation, and evaluation on a scale well beyond the powers of humans alone, including when there are more candidate variables than observations, while allowing theory models to be embedded in the discovery process. Live computer illustrations using Autometrics show the remarkable power and feasibility of this exciting approach. 



Recent Seminars:

December 17, 2009 at 12:00 am - La Défense Campus
Arthur CHARPENTIER (Université de Rennes 1 & Ecole Polytechnique)
(ISDS and Working Group on Risk seminar) 

November 18, 2009 at 12:00 am - room N305
Suprateek SARKER (Copenhagen Business School)
 
October 14, 2009 at 4:30 pm - room N305
Gilbert SAPORTA (CNAM, Paris)
 
 
Subpages (2): Past Seminars Seminars